Of course, people have got the right to sign petitions and write letters of protest to their MPs but in my humble opinion it will not make any difference to the Government’s decision to withdraw the direct funding of the SSPs.
Let me now offer you another school of thought: For four years SSPs have had pump prime funding and now they have to learn how to become self-reliant, sustainable enterprises.
SSPs should regard this situation not as their death warrant, but as a huge opportunity to learn from the social enterprise sector and use their relationships, skills and assets to transform themselves and become community sports enterprises – serving not just schools, but their whole community. But how?
According to the Social Enterprise Coalition: “Social enterprises are business organisations that trade in the market with a social purpose”. They are enterprises which are developed and constituted to fulfil a particular social or community purpose. Their profits are reinvested towards those social or community purposes, and they are normally owned and managed by the members of the community in question.
Setting up the legal framework to function as a social enterprise through becoming a Company Limited by Guarantee or a Community Interest Company is the easy bit. The main challenge is to develop the enterprise culture and skills required and I do appreciate that this is a big leap for many people working in sports development, but one that has to be taken.
Matt Hilton, Director of Specialism at Fleetwood Sports College and Partnership Development Manager at Wyre & Fylde SSP, is one of the many people working within SSPs who feels now is the time to seize the day: ” Following the devastating news from the CSR, it is true to say that SSPs are going through the 7 stages of grieving: shock, denial, anger, guilt, sorrow, acceptance and engagement.
The biggest challenge for SSPs is to accept, engage, adapt and realign their services to meet the needs of existing and potential clients. There is scope for new ways of working in the form of a social enterprise with SSP’s becoming a ‘buy in service’ that offers bespoke services and products that are value for money. Indeed, it could be said that SSPs have operated under the auspices of a social enterprise with their aims and objectives and surplus monies being reinvested for the benefit of children and young people.
One thing is for sure, SSP staff will have to think creatively and be entrepreneurial in developing new ways of working in order to generate new income streams. This will be underpinned through maintaining and building positive relationships with new and existing partners.
If SSPs can make the transition in doing things differently…doing different things, then a highly skilled leadership and management network will continue to transform the lives of young people and the wider community.”
So how could this work? Well-functioning SSPs will have developed a number of initiatives which will have a value for schools, children, parents and the community as a whole. In some cases you would now have to negotiate payment directly with each school and other partners; in other cases you could charge participants and their parents. (People are quite happy to pay for good sporting and customer experiences – just ask the 400,000+ people who play 5 and 6-a-side football every week).
Yes, this means that they are now becoming customers and will have to be treated as such; – you are becoming an enterprise and will have to act accordingly.
Then consider the many changes we are seeing in delivery of community services with asset transfer and commissioning of services and the scope for enterprising SSPs become even greater. With Big Society on the doorstep the opportunities are going to be plentiful.
Also, there are many other potential community partners than schools. One example.
There are 1,900 housing associations in Britain with around 5 million tenants. Most of these partner with local community groups, partly because they are keen to encourage their tenants to engage with their community and partly because it is in their interests to keep their tenants active. So sport and physical activity is an obvious partner. Indeed we know of four housing associations which employ their own sports development officers.
One case-study: INCommunities is the former housing department of Bradford Council. When SMN helped Bradford Dragons Basketball Club to convert into a social enterprise INCommunities attended the launch and as a result a partnership between the two was forged. Consequently, the Dragons run basketball coaching sessions for the tenants in the wards, tenants get subsidised tickets to the Dragons Summer Camp and discounted tickets to the Dragons’ first team home games. The total value of this package to the Dragons is £26,000, which is a lot of money for a small club like the Dragons.
An enterprising SSP could deliver a similar programme.
Also community sports enterprises should be delivering community activity and leisure in the communities, not just schools. What about Pushy Mums programmes where mums pay £3 to run with their buggies in organised groups or Doggy Walks (the one in South Shields attracts 18,000 people once a year who walk 3.5 miles with their pooches and it has raised £3.2m for charity over 15 years)?